Advertisement

You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

Another View: Compromising could catch on

12:08 AM, Apr. 16, 2013  |  Comments
  • Filed Under

Many Democrats have long advised President Barack Obama not to waste his time trying to compromise with Republicans on a budget. And most of the GOP response to the spending plan the president revealed Wednesday appears to prove them right.

There has been some grudging acknowledgment that Obama put some skin in the game by proposing modest cuts to Medicare and Social Security. But almost in the same breath, key Republicans denigrated the move as not worthy of the tax increases the president seeks in return.

Given recent history, there is little reason to be optimistic that these gambits to begin budget negotiations will be any more successful than the efforts to avoid the across-the-board spending cuts known as sequestration, which kicked in on March 1. Until the administration and its loyal opposition can bridge their philosophical divide over taxes and spending, the country seems destined to bounce from one fiscal crisis to another, while instituting occasional stopgap measures to keep the government funded and most services intact.

The president's $3.8 trillion budget is a good first step toward a saner way of conducting the country's business. He would replace the meat cleaver of sequestration with smaller, more targeted cuts. By slicing spending and, yes, increasing some taxes, he expects to reduce the deficit by $1.8 trillion over 10 years.

The proposal that has angered liberals most would change the way the government calculates annual cost-of-living increases in Social Security benefits. "If you want to defend the middle class, you don't cut Social Security," protested independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

Giving it to Obama from the other side were House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio and Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia, both of whom accused the president of holding Medicare and Social Security reforms hostage to further tax hikes. "The president's budget is disingenuous, tossing out a crumb on entitlements," conservative Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin wrote.

That's hyperbole. The Obama budget isn't meant to be the final word. It can and should be adjusted through negotiations, but it is not an unrealistic plan.

Republicans who suggest that it would be better to leave the sequester in place are wrong. The Congressional Budget Office says that if sequestration continues, it will cost 750,000 jobs this year. That's too steep a price for the economy.

Most Americans no longer expect Republicans and Democrats to agree on anything. But they can. Consider the recent movement toward some accord on immigration and gun control.

The budget may be harder, but it doesn't have to be. Politicians are beginning to ponder the consequences of their intransigence at the polls.

Another View

Another View

The Green Bay Press-Gazette occasionally offers Another View, providing an opportunity to read about state, national and international issues covered by writers across the country. The following editorial appeared Friday in the Philadelphia Inquirer.

What's your take on the Packers Family Night change?

Retrieving results.
Watching practice is fine.(Your vote)
15%
576 votes
I'd rather watch a scrimmage.(Your vote)
23%
856 votes
I don't want to pay to watch practice.(Your vote)
27%
1017 votes
It doesn't matter to me.(Your vote)
34%
1271 votes

Catch up on the latest in our pregame show every game day.

Football fans

If you've ever answered "Who has the ball?" with "It's halftime," you might recognize The Airhead. Check out the characters in our cartoon gallery of oddball fans.

Special Reports

ORDER YOURS

Football fans

If you've ever answered "Who has the ball?" with "It's halftime," you might recognize The Airhead. Check out the characters in our cartoon gallery of oddball fans.

Special Reports